will probably catch on in about five years.) (This may well be the future of the entire superhero genre-see also: Spider-Man: Homecoming-which means that DC Comics and Warner Bros. As a result, we now have Thor: Ragnarok, which is perfectly acceptable as an action movie but moderately inspired as a comedy. Forget the ridiculousness of Norsemen from outer space: Guardians offered up an ambulatory houseplant and a talking raccoon, and leaned hard into the absurdity of both. The first film had the mildly Shakespearian vibe that one might have expected from its director, Kenneth Branagh the second capitalized on the realization that its titular hero, played by Chris Hemsworth, was less compelling than his Asgardian adopted brother and nemesis, Loki (Tom Hiddleston).īut it wasn’t until 2014’s Guardians of the Galaxy that Marvel came upon a true model for Thor moving forward. (Way too Shazam.) But the Thor franchise has been a balancing act from the start. Wisely, the studio chose to forego (as the comic eventually had) his alter ego as a hobbled physician with a walking stick that could suddenly make him-boom!- the God of Thunder. When Marvel Studios released the original Thor in 2011, it was their trickiest franchise to date: This time the hero was not an irradiated Earthling or a guy in a metal suit, but a surfer-blond extraterrestrial who also happened to be a Norse god with a magic hammer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |